Saturday, December 20, 2003 - 03:27 pm Atten: all Heads of States The British empire is looking for new members. If you are new to the game and would like to join pls ask for an invite to the federation. If you are an active Head of state intrested in the finer details of running a Federation. Job openings for First Lord of Commerce, First lord of interior, First lord of Marketing and Second lord of the military. Sir Emanuel III Chairman,Commander and Chief British Empire
| |
Monday, December 22, 2003 - 04:43 pm well, I don't understand a **** of this game, so I guess I could need a federation, yes :P as I have understood it, you have to invite me, right? I'll send you a message anyway
| |
Friday, December 26, 2003 - 06:53 pm How do I get in your Fed??
| |
Friday, December 26, 2003 - 11:05 pm for an invite message the chairman....ah... ..uhmmmm... that... would be me.and tell me you want an invite we are growing fast. join in and you will get a title and you could be responsible for part of the governing of the federation. Chairman Sir Emanuel III, British Empire
| |
Thursday, January 01, 2004 - 01:14 pm British Empire structure and vacant seats: ------------------House Of Lords------------------- Chairman: ****Imperial New York First Lord of Commerce *** Imperial Fantasia First Lord of the Military *** (VACANT) First Lord of the Interior *** Imperial Andor ----------------------------------------------------- ==================Hall of Nobility================= Noble of Commerce: **Giant Noble of the Military: (VACANT) Noble of the Interior: (VACANT) ******************Voting members******************* *Canadian Colony Note if your interested in filling a seat in the House of Lords or Hall of Nobility please e-mail me for an invite. Sir Emanuel III Chairman, British Empire
| |
Thursday, January 08, 2004 - 11:03 am hey if their are any new players out here we are intrested in having you in our federation. we just signed on two more and have two in the process of joining so come on by and give us a try.....umm...on wow that rythmes hehehe...BUT IT WONT MEAN ANYTHING WHEN WE TAKE OVER THE WORLD MUHUHAHAHAHAhahaha.ha..ha ..ha......Oh ....ummm sorry just my evil little tendancies. message me for and invite and leave a message here on the BB. Thanks. Sir Emanuel III Chairman, British Empire
| |
Saturday, January 10, 2004 - 06:11 pm i wonder if my country's name would be appropriate for your federation?
| |
Sunday, January 11, 2004 - 07:00 am take over the world?! LOL! lmao... I guess the rule changes haven't gotten to you yet, have they?
| |
Sunday, January 11, 2004 - 11:41 pm such as?
| |
Monday, January 12, 2004 - 07:13 am 8. War limitation for new players New players, who are interested in the full game, including war, will enjoy a 100 game months protection from war. They will lose this protection if they start a war themselves. This feature is already in the game but the period is 36 months. 66. War is more complicated - requires some smarter strategy 77. Shortages of officers or soldiers in the army 92. Resetting countries in Kebir blue, Fearless blue and White giant 142. Large attacks in wars Watching the war logs in recent days, we have seen that some of these wars involve many thousands of weapons in each attack. We have seen 8000 tanks attack a single defense fortification. These numbers are unrealistic. Attacks can be massive but thousands of heavy weapons and bombers in each attack are not realistic. We intend to look at these attacks and limit their size. 186. Rebellions Resets and the peaceful country features pretty much kill your plans. Sorry
| |
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 12:55 am You forgot something, Salamat--limit to the number of countries in a federation. I think it's 25. Hypothetically, a fed could take over the non-peaceful world if every non-peaceful country was part of the empire of a member country. If the number of countries/empires in a fed could be unbounded, it might be conceivable that a large group of similarly minded people could take over the (non-peaceful) world, even with resets, rebellions, and war difficulties (since feds don't automatically lose their reset/deregged members). With all those things (but without the protection from themselves), a large group of similarly minded people would probably go into a great civil war (or get caught for multying) before completing their goals--people here aren't that similarly minded! -Nimz
| |
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 05:35 am OMFG! a 10,000 weapon attack is over kill compared to the average size of this worlds army. this makes the 10K limit a minor inconvienance, not a joy kill. rebels start making this hard after what...10 countries? over a short 6 month period 10 countries is alot to build a sizable military force. true, C3's are alittle more difficult now, but still attackable. as for the federation limits, i don't think any fed in this game will reach the 25 country limit. if one such fed does accomplish this amazing task, who would they attack/defend against? 25 players is about all the active (and minorly skilled) countries out there. sorry, I just don't understand what the problem is.
| |
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 05:39 am I just want to add that since there are no 40mil pop countries left in the world, I think you would be lucky (or good) to get over a 1mil military. not including officers, that is.
| |
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 - 08:06 am Hmm, it seem there is alot of great ppl in this thread. Well I'm Edward, a member of British Empire Federation. Hasn't been long in this game, so I guess much advise will be needed from you all. I see that you all are talking about war and it rules. Well, I do admit the changes do make it hard to wage a war wih C3. And sad to say, after the changes, I haven't been to war or attack any country(if that matter) yet. So I guess some wise advise from you all will be great! As I'm planning to take a slave country, well no sure when cause really need to get my country into good shape first. Well, thanks for all the input above, but still we are aiming the same target. Well, I know it seem impossible, but when there is a will, there is a way. So I guess British Empire will have to find the way.
| |
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 12:33 am 10000 attackers compared to how many defenders? Alot of highly skilled marksmen, if you attack a c3! I seem to recall some feds forming divisions b/c of too many members. There are more than 25 minorly skilled active players. Resets happen every 4 months now. Rebellions start after 5 countries (I think). Sorry this response is so choppy. Don't have time to edit it right now. -Nimz
| |
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 12:40 am Well, I am not saying war is impossible, but the resets and other rules are not really conducive to world domination... On Golden Rainbow, a great movement, which I was once a part of, failed to achieve its goals due to the changes and the peaceful country feature... A veteran friend of mine and the leader of that movement, esperandus, eventually gave up... The attrition rates and lack of good players now is also depressing and will make it hard to find good active allies. Is it possible? It very well may be... But it is going to be VERY hard. I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors. -Salamat
| |
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 12:43 am "I seem to recall some feds forming divisions b/c of too many members. " Many used to... it is a sad say in SimCountry when it is said that 25 federation members is hard or impossible to achieve.
| |
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 01:19 am December 29, 2003 Once the Peaceful Country feature is in place and all countries had their opportunity to convert, we will increase the max. size of attacks from the current 10,000. At the same time, review of the effects of war and continuous observation of the power of attacks and the defensive capabilities of weapons will continue. Recent changes corrected errors in the devastating powers of some offensive weapons.
| |
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 - 12:48 pm That doesn't mean new countries cannot be peaceful. And, "Recent changes corrected errors in the devastating powers of some offensive weapons" can be a good or very bad thing depending if they thought the weapons were too devastating or not devastating enough.
| |
Thursday, January 15, 2004 - 12:32 am The particular fed I was considering is the one run by Riv in WG. I don't remember the name off the top of my head, tho. Riv has a fed in KB under the same name, but that one has had dismal turnout, last I checked.
| |
Thursday, January 15, 2004 - 06:30 pm how about you take this discussion on war in the war thread??
| |
Friday, January 16, 2004 - 12:50 am "how about you take this discussion on war in the war thread?? " yeah, ok. everyone just stop posting and forget about this thread.
| |
Friday, January 16, 2004 - 04:30 am lol
| |
Friday, January 16, 2004 - 06:09 am threads are what you make of them. do you recall the *Satan's Army* thread?
| |
Friday, January 16, 2004 - 03:26 pm Now, please don't be sarcastic in this thread. Anyway, until now, Spassky or better known as Nimz, MIT and Ghost of the Fearless Blue, you guys haven't really gives me hints or tips about how to fight war nowadays. I need numbers not theories from the doc. I will read the doc every now and then tho. By the way, is the anyone interested to join British Empire Fed? And that invitation inludes for the 3 of you who have kept this thread active. ps/ the Satan Army thread is so corrupted that it can't be revisited anymore regardless you are a holy man or the sinner. lol
| |
Thursday, January 22, 2004 - 02:43 am The official mesage board of the British Empire is at : http://britishempire.proboards21.com/index.cgi Everything you need and want to know is there so visit there as this thread will be left out.
| |
Thursday, January 22, 2004 - 10:48 am I was never sarcastic in this thread :P
| |
Friday, January 23, 2004 - 03:33 am wrong thread macalania, you didnt even post here ever.
| |
Friday, January 23, 2004 - 06:00 am excuse me, ;P If you check, MIT no longer exists. I simply deregged and regged another.
| |
Friday, January 23, 2004 - 05:36 pm OHHHHHH BURNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!
| |
Friday, January 23, 2004 - 07:08 pm I wondered if that wasn't the case For what it's worth, I noticed the disappearance of MIT.
| |
Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 07:05 am Well, ghost has called me on my reason for deregging. Some members of the old crew, Horde and I have decided to give Ghost some trouble. Funny how the biggest war ranks are involved, yet it will still be a small war. Ghost, nothing personal, but my reason for pursuing you was your contradiction of me in this thread.
| |
Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 07:18 am Hail the monkies!! The best fed at the implementation of the resets!
| |
Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 06:37 pm Hail the Cool Ranch Doritos!! Tastiest damn chip around! mmmmmmm ::goes to the store::
| |
Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 08:50 pm lmao
| |
Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 10:39 pm LOL! your such a dumbass. you should have waited until I attacked Hand of God 10 b4 you unvailed your great plan. I would have waisted my entire offencive army on that country and you could have walked in and killed me at your own pace. now my army will kill atleast one of you chumps. two on one, odds in my favor. ALL HAIL WARTIME CONCUBINE!!!!!
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 12:29 am rotf! You deregged and reregged just to get back for what Ghost said a week and a half ago. Well, happy warring!
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:06 am lol, well I defer to horde on that one for wartime tactics. And worse comes to worse, I lose a country I have had for a week, and f00k over yours. By the way with your war rank and army size, I doubt you can take us. seeing as you just admitted that a c3 would have wasted your entire offence and that my defense is better than a c3's.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:11 am anyway, I want to keep something interesting in this world. I moved because my previous location was abysmal. This gives me a chance to fight against a real player using real strategy in a more level playing field than I have ever had the chance to have. I hope no hard feelings Wartime, I hope you understand my real motivation to declare on you soon. The contradiction here was just my excuse ;). I look forward to some fun.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:12 am remember, you were once an ally of this dumbass
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:36 am true dat. that's why I was cautious with horde, I knew I heared his name once b4 but I couldn't remember from what. by the way, I might have exaggerated about the C3 waisting my army. tick, tock the clock is ticking. balls in your court now and the longer you wait, the stronger I get.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:48 am only one request, no mud slinging. lets have some fun.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 07:49 am No mud gonna come from over here and besides you regged next to me not like I planned this one. We where just gonna wait but then it would have been totally boring atleast now we can make some dramatic buildup to this small fight :/ ::plays dramatic music::
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:35 am lmao. Indeed, I await the fun.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:35 am Once again, I believe we have comandeered this thread. Muahahahahhah! rofl
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:38 am HAIL Cheese!
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 11:33 am Oh I use to play Kiev/Mercury on FB before the resets and now I play blackrock spire and the clan contries on GR. Maybe you recognize the horde name from one of my slaves or ceo there? Your right looks like another thread bites the dust.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 11:35 am and we didn't comandeer... We liberated the thread get it right. :oP
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 12:08 pm lmao. ok... this thread has been liberated into our discussion. We 0wnz
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 02:39 pm omfg, I guess contracts will soon be counted in the spending limit... though they said weapon limit would be increased, the massive dumps I used to do were probably well over what the new spending limit will be. Contract dumps no more! omg wtf
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 08:55 pm soon be or already are? o.O
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 09:13 pm soon be, within the next few weeks. how long have you had this country horde? your still in protection....that sucks.
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:03 pm what is this has to do with the "British Empire"??
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 10:15 pm hey, take that "british empire" stuff to the british empire thread. you no more post here, hehe
| |
Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 11:34 pm Yeah it does suck doesn't it :D It's been a long time I just never bothered logging in. You could have been there before me but I don't recall there being any neighbors when I regged it
| |
Monday, January 26, 2004 - 12:05 am when I noticed you were next to me, your last login date was Dec 13th and I regged on dec 27th.
| |
Monday, January 26, 2004 - 04:21 am OK good then I didn't just pull that statement out of my arse then I was actually right yay
| |
Monday, January 26, 2004 - 05:09 am hey, take that "british empire" stuff to the british empire thread. you no more post here, hehe lmaoz
| |
Monday, January 26, 2004 - 06:17 am ::dies laughing::
| |
Monday, January 26, 2004 - 06:15 pm ::dies laughing:: thank god, this makes my job alot easier. oh dammit, that's your CEO account.
| |
Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 05:34 am omg, it took me a while to get one. I didnt think you were quoting him at first, so it didnt make sense, lolz
| |
Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 05:53 am :rolling eyes: Drat, that doesn't work here! At least I can make these faces
| |
Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 10:06 am unfortunately I am hear with a platoon of the welsh guard to take this thread back signed HM canadian colony member of the british empire
| |
Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 12:17 am wow, a whole platoon? are they behind you then? I don't see them...
| |
Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 01:26 am lets fuck him over!! We 0wn this thread
| |
Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 02:52 pm There will be none of this nonsense fed talk in the federation threads you crazy bastards. This is insanity! Take your fed discussions to the fricken Scores and Awards section like everyone else you jive ass turkey.
| |
Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 06:13 pm how exactly will a welsh platoon hurt us? I say dereg and reg over here, and bring it.
| |
Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:49 pm Maybe that's why he said "unfortunately"
| |
Friday, January 30, 2004 - 06:14 am how exactly will a welsh platoon hurt us? by throwing jam at you, or maybe by drowning you in grape juice?
| |
Friday, January 30, 2004 - 07:21 pm if you wanna hijack something go to http://britishempire.proboards21.com/index.cgi its completly under no control
| |
Friday, January 30, 2004 - 09:45 pm I already read this messege, so stop posting it.
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 01:46 am countries in the top 10 with war rank's of 500 piss me off.
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:11 am agreed, and it is VERY easy to get war ranks, wtf?!
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:12 am this looks like it *could* be my last post as the war is about to go active. Let it be known I am having fun, wheeeeeeeeee!!!
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:38 am an intresting observation: macalania's war index dropped to 65% after the first attack. unemployment and low buisness index are the blame. mine droped to 90%.
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:39 am ok, so I did run my country poorly, thanks. Yeah, nobody wanted to work, so trade suffered. Anyway, I loved it how my entire offense was mercilessly slaughtered.
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:40 am mine too. I thought I could atleast kill one of your soldiers, but alas not.
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 02:42 am All I can say is OMG wtf. I mean a nation that focused on defense only could probably be like invincible in this game. :/
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 03:00 am you would really have to plan the attack perfectly to win a war with a total defence country. it's inconcevible!
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 03:07 am I bet my index drops to low 40s witht he first attack :D
| |
Saturday, January 31, 2004 - 09:33 pm Isn't this supposed to be the world where the offensive aspect of war is easy?!?
| |
Sunday, February 01, 2004 - 01:13 am lol. It is virtually impossible for most players here to kill a live opponent now. Thank you w3
| |
Sunday, February 01, 2004 - 02:37 am just curious Horde, how many helio missile do you have left?
| |
Sunday, February 01, 2004 - 03:47 am when did I lose 25k defence helios? no mention of any large losses in the paper.
| |
Sunday, February 01, 2004 - 04:13 am beats me I know I tyook out 40 of them though muwahahahaha and I have well over 3 million for DH so don't get any bright ideas :D before any of this started this country was being used to stock ammo
| |
Sunday, February 01, 2004 - 04:18 am wow. now I'm convinced the point of the game is to take as many slaves as you can. cuz war with a good player is retarded.
| |
Monday, February 02, 2004 - 08:01 am yup, 160k jeeps 40k tanks 15k oaamb and I managed to destroy 40 DH, 2 forts and 85% of a capitol :/
| |
Tuesday, February 03, 2004 - 12:05 am Hostilities between Horde and Wartime Concubine Reborn Thu Apr 26, 2182 Horde ground or air force attacks Electric Components electric co The Wartime Concubine Reborn forces lost 40 helicopters. The Horde forces lost 6920 offensive aa batteries. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. yeah, appearently 40=25,000 to w3c cuz that's the only mention of any kind of losses on my side.
|